U.S.–Venezuela Conflict
TAGS: CSE Main ExamsDollar HegemonyGeneral StudiesPetrodollarU.S.–Venezuela Conflict
Spread the love

Venezuela, the Petrodollar, and the Last Battle for Dollar Hegemony

Why the U.S.–Venezuela Conflict Is Not About Drugs, Terrorism, or Democracy ?

For decades, American foreign interventions have been sold to the public under familiar banners—democracy promotion, counter-terrorism, drug control, or human rights. Venezuela, however, exposes a far more uncomfortable truth.

The real reason behind escalating U.S. aggression toward Venezuela is neither Nicolás Maduro’s authoritarianism nor cocaine trafficking nor electoral legitimacy.

It is about the survival of the U.S. dollar itself.

At the center of this conflict lies a 50-year-old financial architecture that has sustained American global dominance since the Cold War: the petrodollar system. Venezuela did not merely challenge U.S. policy. It challenged the monetary foundation of American power.

And historically, that is something Washington does not tolerate.

The Petrodollar: The Hidden Pillar of American Power

In 1974, in the aftermath of the Nixon Shock and the collapse of the gold standard, the United States faced a crisis. The dollar was no longer backed by gold. Confidence was fragile. Inflation was rising. The Bretton Woods system was dead.

Henry Kissinger, then Secretary of State, engineered a solution.

The Kissinger–Saudi Deal

The agreement with Saudi Arabia was simple—and revolutionary:

  • All global oil sales would be priced exclusively in U.S. dollars
  • Oil-exporting states would recycle surplus dollars into U.S. Treasuries
  • In exchange, the U.S. would provide military protection

This created artificial global demand for dollars.

Every country on Earth suddenly needed U.S. dollars—not because of productivity or trust, but because oil, the lifeblood of modern civilization, required it.

This single arrangement enabled the United States to:

  • Run permanent trade deficits
  • Print currency without immediate collapse
  • Fund massive military spending
  • Sustain global financial dominance

The petrodollar became more important than aircraft carriers, more decisive than nuclear weapons.

And any nation that threatened it became a target.

Venezuela: The Ultimate Threat to Dollar Supremacy

Venezuela holds 303 billion barrels of proven oil reserves—the largest on Earth.

  • More than Saudi Arabia
  • Roughly 20% of global proven reserves

But oil volume alone was not the threat.

The threat was how Venezuela chose to sell it.

Breaking Free from the Dollar

Beginning in 2018, Venezuela openly announced its intention to:

  • Accept Chinese yuan, euros, rubles, and other currencies for oil
  • Reduce and ultimately eliminate dollar-based transactions
  • Build direct payment systems with China that bypassed SWIFT
  • Petition for BRICS membership
  • Integrate with Russia, China, and Iran—the core architects of de-dollarization

This was not symbolic.

Venezuela was sitting on enough oil to finance non-dollar trade for decades.

If successful, it would provide a real-world blueprint for energy exporters to escape dollar dependency.

That is an existential threat to the U.S. financial system.

A Familiar Pattern: What Happens to Petrodollar Dissidents

History is unambiguous.

Iraq – 2000

Saddam Hussein announced Iraq would sell oil in euros, not dollars.

Iraq – 2003

The U.S. invaded under the pretext of weapons of mass destruction—none were ever found.

After regime change:

  • Iraqi oil sales returned to dollars
  • Saddam Hussein was executed

Libya – 2009

Muammar Gaddafi proposed a gold-backed African dinar to replace the dollar and euro in oil trade.

Leaked U.S. State Department emails later confirmed this monetary initiative as a primary reason for NATO intervention.

Libya – 2011

NATO bombed Libya.
Gaddafi was brutally murdered.
The gold dinar project died with him.

Libya collapsed into chaos, slave markets, and permanent instability.

The pattern is unmistakable.

Challenge the petrodollar. Get regime changed.

Nicolás Maduro represents a threat larger than Saddam and Gaddafi combined.

Why?

Because Venezuela has:

  • Five times more oil
  • Active yuan-based oil sales
  • Direct integration with China’s financial systems
  • Strategic partnerships with Russia and Iran
  • A formal path toward BRICS

This is not coincidence. It is convergence.

Russia, China, and Iran are the leading forces dismantling dollar dominance. Venezuela was becoming their most powerful energy ally in the Western Hemisphere.

The language coming from U.S. officials has been unusually revealing.

Stephen Miller openly declared:

American sweat, ingenuity and toil created the oil industry in Venezuela. Its tyrannical expropriation was the largest recorded theft of American wealth and property.”

The implication is stunning.

By this logic:

  • National sovereignty is invalid
  • Resource nationalization is “theft”
  • Corporate development grants eternal ownership

This is not international law.

It is colonial entitlement, openly stated.

The Deeper Crisis: The Petrodollar Is Already Cracking

Even without Venezuela, the system is under strain:

 

    • Russia sells oil in rubles and yuan

    • Iran trades almost entirely outside the dollar

    • Saudi Arabia openly discusses yuan settlements

    • China’s CIPS network now connects thousands of banks worldwide

    • m-Bridge enables instant central-bank settlements in local currencies

    • BRICS is building parallel financial architecture

Venezuela joining BRICS with the world’s largest oil reserves would accelerate de-dollarization exponentially.

This is why the response has been force, not diplomacy.

  • Drugs? Venezuela supplies less than 1% of U.S. cocaine
  • Terrorism? No credible evidence exists
  • Democracy? The U.S. supports absolute monarchies with no elections

These narratives are instruments, not causes.

The real issue is monetary control.

The invasion sends a clear signal: Trade outside the dollar, and you will be punished.

But this message may backfire.

Instead of deterring de-dollarization, it may accelerate it.

Because the Global South is drawing its own conclusion:

If the dollar is maintained by violence, the only safety lies in abandoning it—together, and faster.

History Rhymes

  • January 3, 1990: Panama invaded, Noriega captured
  • January 3, 2026: Venezuela invaded, Maduro captured

Same accusations.
Same playbook.
Same strategic logic.


What Comes Next

  • A U.S.-backed opposition government
  • Oil contracts reassigned
  • Dollar-based trade restored
  • U.S. corporations return

Another Iraq.
Another Libya.

What happens when bombing no longer works?

When China has the economic leverage to retaliate?
When BRICS controls nearly half of global GDP?
When countries realize the petrodollar survives not on trust, but on coercion?

This invasion is not a demonstration of strength.

It is an admission of weakness.

When a currency must be enforced by bombs, it is already losing.

Venezuela is not the beginning of this story.

It may be the desperate end.

Author